On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 11:46:06PM -0700, Talin wrote: > I like it. Its a much cleaner organization than the 2.4 libs. I would > like to see it used as a starting point for a reorg of the standard lib > namespace. I'm not convinced that the chapter organization of a book is necessarily the best choice for the actual package layout of the standard library. A grouping that's useful for reference may not be ideal for staying in one's memory. --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4