A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/065416.html below:

[Python-Dev] fixing buildbots

[Python-Dev] fixing buildbots [Python-Dev] fixing buildbotsNeal Norwitz nnorwitz at gmail.com
Tue May 30 08:54:10 CEST 2006
I've been starting to get some of the buildbots working again.  There
was some massive problem on May 25 where a ton of extra files were
left around.  I can't remember if I saw something about that at the
NFS sprint or not.

There is a lingering problem that I can't fix on all the boxes.  Namely:

  cp Modules/Setup{.dist,}

Should we always do that step before we build on the buildbots?  The
warning about Setup.dist being newer than Setup is displayed.  I can
understand why we wouldn't want to unconditionally overwrite a user's
modified Setup.  However, for the buildbots, it seems safer to always
overwrite it.

Any objections?  Any ideas for the best way to implement this?  A
separate BB step for Unix clients?   In the makefile?

Martin, I would have fixed it on your Solaris box, but I don't think I
can get access to the buildbot's account.

n
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4