Armin Rigo wrote: > I know this. These corner cases are debatable and different answers > could be seen as correct, as I think is the case for find(). My point > was different: I was worrying that the recent change in str.find() would > needlessly send existing and working programs into infinite loops, which > can be a particularly bad kind of failure for some applications. since "abc".find("", 0) == 0, I would have thought that a program that searched for an empty string in a loop wouldn't get anywhere at all. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4