A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/065414.html below:

[Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup

[Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookup [Python-Dev] Let's stop eating exceptions in dict lookupFredrik Lundh fredrik at pythonware.com
Tue May 30 07:48:50 CEST 2006
Armin Rigo wrote:

> I know this.  These corner cases are debatable and different answers
> could be seen as correct, as I think is the case for find().  My point
> was different: I was worrying that the recent change in str.find() would
> needlessly send existing and working programs into infinite loops, which
> can be a particularly bad kind of failure for some applications.

since "abc".find("", 0) == 0, I would have thought that a program that 
searched for an empty string in a loop wouldn't get anywhere at all.

</F>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4