2006/5/26, Steven Bethard <steven.bethard at gmail.com>: > On 5/26/06, Facundo Batista <facundobatista at gmail.com> wrote: > > Aaaaall this different ways enforce my vote: we should get an error... > ... > But if this change goes in, I want a big "we're breaking backwards > incompatibility" message somewhere. I say if you really want an > exception raised for these cases, ask for the behavior change in > Python 3000. All it would give us in Python 2.X is a bunch of broken > code. Of course that this change can not be made in 2.x. Regards, -- . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4