Sean Reifschneider wrote: >> - Treat the negative as a reverser, so we get back (3, 2, 1). > > Then we could get: > > >>> print -123 > 321 > > Yay! and while we're at it, let's fix this: >>> 0.66 * (1, 2, 3) (1, 2) and maybe even this >>> 0.5 * (1, 2, 3) (1, 1) but I guess the latter one might need a pronunciation. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4