A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/065186.html below:

[Python-Dev] A Horrible Inconsistency

[Python-Dev] A Horrible Inconsistency [Python-Dev] A Horrible InconsistencyTim Peters tim.peters at gmail.com
Thu May 25 23:25:07 CEST 2006
[Raymond Hettinger]
...
> Also, I'm not clear on the rationale for transforming negative
> repetition counts to zero instead of raising an exception.

There are natural use cases.  Here's one:  you have a string and want
to right-justify it to 80 columns with blanks if it's shorter than 80.

    s = " " * (80 - len(s)) + s

does the right thing in all cases, because the blank repetition
gracefully collapses to an empty string whenever len(s) >= 80.  I've
used that (and variants thereof) dozens of times.  Then again, I don't
believe I've ever used the "integer * sequence" form (i.e., with the
integer on the left).
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4