2006/5/19, Tim Peters <tim.peters at gmail.com>: > If you're not a numeric expert, I wouldn't recommend that you try this > yourself (in particular, trying to implement x**y as exp(ln(x)*y) > using the same precision is mathematically correct but is numerically > badly naive). I'd start to see this not before two weeks (I have a conference, and need to finish my papers). TIm, we both know that I'm not, under any point of view, a numeric expert. So, I'd ask you a favor. Could you please send here some examples, for a given precision, of perilous "not-int ** not-int" situations, just to add them to the test cases and be sure that the modifications to Decimal are safe enough? Or just point to some docs? Thank you very much! -- . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4