Am Montag 22 Mai 2006 02:22 schrieb Greg Ewing: > Heiko Wundram wrote: > > for node in tree: > > if not node.haschildren(): > > continue > > <do something with node> > > Er, you do realise that can be written more straightforwardly as > > for node in tree: > if node.haschildren(): > <do something with node> Yes, of course. Read my replies to Terry J. Reed, to Josiah Carlton, to Talin, to see why I chose to compare it to the 'continue' syntax. --- Heiko.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4