RetroSearch Browse

Mon May 22 02:46:30 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/065103.html

Heiko Wundram wrote:

> 2) Just as I've replied to Terry J. Reed, if you find list comprehensions easy 
> to read, you're also bound to be able to understand what "for <expr> in 
> <expr> if <expr>:" does, at least AFAICT.

I tend to write non-trivial LCs on multiple lines, e.g.

   l = [foo(x)
     for x in stuff
       if something_about(x)]

for the very reason that it makes them easier to read.

--
Greg

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/065103.html below:

Unification of for statement and list-comp syntax