Heiko Wundram wrote:
> for node in tree:
> if not node.haschildren():
> continue
> <do something with node>
Er, you do realise that can be written more straightforwardly as
for node in tree:
if node.haschildren():
<do something with node>
--
Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4