[Brett Cannon] > Ignorant question probably, but why can't the test just check for the > directory first, and remove it if it exists? Because it's a stupid hack that should never be necessary: the test cleans up after itself in a "finally" clause. It only looks attractive right now because an earlier bug caused the Windows boxes to swap themselves to death, and the "finally" clause never executed. So, what the heck, sure, I checked that in :-)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4