Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Vladimir 'Yu' Stepanov wrote: > >> Yes. I understood it when resulted a set example. >> >>> However, as I just said, people usually don't remove items from >>> just-sorted lists, they tend to iterate over them via 'for i in list:' . >>> >>> >> Such problem arises at creation of the list of timers. >> > > For a list of timers/timeout events, a priority queue is often the best > data structure, which is already available through the heapq module. > It is in most cases valid so. heapq very much approaches for these purposes. The unique problem is connected with removal of an any element from the list. -- Vladimir Stepanov
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4