RetroSearch Browse

Tue May 2 19:24:33 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/064788.html

Georg Brandl wrote:

>Guido van Rossum wrote:
>  
>
>>Backticks certainly are deprecated -- Py3k won't have them (nor will
>>they become available for other syntax; they are undesirable
>>characters due to font issues and the tendency of word processing
>>tools to generate backticks in certain cases where you type forward
>>ticks).
>>    
>>
>
>And would it be acceptable for 2.5 to issue a DeprecationWarning for
>backticks?
>
>  
>
No.  Backticks do not disappear until Py3.0 and we're not going to 
muck-up the 2.x series with warnings and deprecations for everything 
that is going to change in Py3.0.

Raymond

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/064788.html below:

[Python-Dev] more pyref: a better term for "string conversion"