RetroSearch Browse

Tue May 2 13:28:49 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/064779.html

Greg Ewing wrote:
> Josiah Carlson wrote:
>> and am +0 on the double use below:
>>
>>     for x in y:
>>         for x in z:
> 
> Can anyone think of a plausible use case for that?

This really seems more like the domain of pychecker/pylint rather than the 
compiler. The code may be a bad idea, but I don't see any reason to make it a 
syntax error.

Cheers,
Nick.

-- 
Nick Coghlan   |   ncoghlan at gmail.com   |   Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
             http://www.boredomandlaziness.org

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-May/064779.html below:

[Python-Dev] elimination of scope bleeding ofiteration variables