Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Ok. I think I would use base64, of possibly compressed content. It's > more compact than your representation, as it only uses 1.3 characters > per byte, instead of the up-to-four bytes that the img2py uses. only if you're shipping your code as PY files. in PYC format (ZIP, PY2EXE, etc), the img2py format is more efficient. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4