""Martin v. Löwis"" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote in message > I clipped it because I couldn't understand your question: "Why" what? > (the second question only gives "Why not") I then assumed that the > question must have applied to the text that immediately preceded the > question - hence that's the text that I left. > > Now I understand, though. For future reference, when I respond to a post, I usually try to help readers by snipping away inessentials, leaving only the essential context of my responses. Terry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4