Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > I.e., why not just document that the arguments should > > be used as keyword arguments, and leave it at that. > > Because they wouldn't be keyword-only arguments, then. which reminds me of the following little absurdity gem from the language reference: The following identifiers are used as keywords of the language, and cannot be used as ordinary identifiers. They must be spelled exactly as written here: /.../ (maybe it's just me). btw, talking about idioms used in the language reference, can any of the native speakers on this list explain if "A is a nicer way of spelling B" means that "A is preferred over B", "B is preferred over A", "A and B are the same word and whoever wrote this is just being absurd", or anything else ? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4