Terry Reedy wrote: >>>> Now, suppose you wanted to have 'key' be a keyword-only argument. >>> Why? Why not let the user type the additional argument(s) without the >>> parameter name? > > Like Martin, you clipped most of the essential context of my question: > Talin's second proposal. I clipped it because I couldn't understand your question: "Why" what? (the second question only gives "Why not") I then assumed that the question must have applied to the text that immediately preceded the question - hence that's the text that I left. Now I understand, though. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4