Brett Cannon wrote: > On 3/28/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >>My view is that nothing should be "considered" unless there is >>a) a volunteer to operate the tracker (or, failing that, somebody who >> does it for money), and >>b) an importer of whatever data SF can provide. > > And as the chair of the infrastructure committee, those are the base > requirements for a tracker to be considered. > > Once we have the complete SF data I will put out a call for proposals > for trackers along with who has volunteered to manage them so that > people can band together to help push their favorite tracker. FWIW: Trac has a Sourceforge bug tracker import script: http://projects.edgewall.com/trac/browser/trunk/contrib/sourceforge2trac.py Apologies: for the other blank reply. -- Robert Kern robert.kern at gmail.com "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4