RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 30 19:44:55 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063188.html

M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Anthony Baxter wrote:
>> On Friday 31 March 2006 02:04, M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>>> Excellent point. Hm. Maybe we should just go with 'sqlite',
>>>> instead.
>>> Anything, but please no "db" or "database" top-level module or
>>> package :-)
>> 
>> 
>> How about "sql"? <wink>
>> 
>> I can't think of a better name right now - can anyone else, or should 
>> it just go in the top level as 'sqlite'?
> 
> I think sqlite is just fine.

sqlite is problematic since the old PySQLite 1.0 (2.x wrapper) had this name.
But I'm in favour of a flat name too -- let's use "sqlite3".

Georg

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063188.html below:

[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?