Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > I'm obviously missing something here. > > One thing that you are *obviously* missing (there might be more): > > Nobody has stepped forward and said "I make trac happen". Without > somebody (specific) saying that, all technical arguments in favour > of that software are futile. I'm quite sure I've already pointed to http://www.python-hosting.com/freetrac which could be used by the Python 3000 activity in order to evaluate Trac, and to http://www.python-hosting.com/shared_hosting plus a small fraction of the PSF budget for the Python code, if Trac is found to be good enough, and provided that the PH folks think that it's a good idea to host core development on their platform (I assume we have pretty good stats for how svn.python.org is being used). I can ask them for a test py3k account, if there's any interest. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4