M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > Will it also work with e.g. sqlite 2.8.15 (ie. sqlite < v3) - > this is the standard version on SuSE 9.2. No, SQLite 3 has a completely different API than SQLite 2.x. If you need a Python module for it, you can use pysqlite 1.0.1. >>>Also your statement regarding sqlite3 suggests that sqlite >>>itself is not included - why not ? >> >>For the same reasons we don't include the BerkeleyDB library. Many, >>many modern operating systems now ship with libsqlite3 (just as they >>ship with bsddb). While sqlite is nowhere near the size of >>BerkeleyDB, it's still a non-trivial amount of code. > > > If it works with sqlite2 then I agree: these versions are > usually available on Unixes. sqlite3 is not as wide-spread > yet. > > What about the Windows build ? Will that contain the necessary > DLLs ? I proposed to link dynamically on Windows, and ship the Windows SQLite3.DLL. This has two advantages: - Python users can upgrade the SQLite3.DLL by a simple download from in case of emergency - we could make it so that win32 Python core developers (or the Python win32 build process) don't have to build SQLite when building Python -- Gerhard
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4