RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 30 18:09:43 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063175.html

Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Anthony Baxter wrote:
> 
> 
>>>Such a module name is less likely to cause problems.
>>
>>Excellent point. Hm. Maybe we should just go with 'sqlite', instead.
> 
> 
> except that "sqlite" was the name used by the first pysqlite
> generation:
> 
> $ python2.3
> 
>>>>import sqlite
>>>>sqlite.version
> 
> '1.1.6'
> 
> I'm not sure how much trouble reusing this name would cause, but I'm
> quite sure the amount of trouble is larger than "none at all".

"sqlitedb" is not taken yet.

-- Gerhard

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063175.html below:

[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?