RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 30 17:50:13 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063173.html

Anthony Baxter wrote:

> > Such a module name is less likely to cause problems.
>
> Excellent point. Hm. Maybe we should just go with 'sqlite', instead.

except that "sqlite" was the name used by the first pysqlite
generation:

$ python2.3
>>> import sqlite
>>> sqlite.version
'1.1.6'

I'm not sure how much trouble reusing this name would cause, but I'm
quite sure the amount of trouble is larger than "none at all".

</F>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063173.html below:

[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?