Thomas Wouters wrote: > > Have you looked at SqlObject? (and its associated modules > sqlobject.sqlbuilder in particular) > > SQLAlchemy (www.sqlalchemy.org <http://www.sqlalchemy.org>) is also > nice, in particular for more complex setups. > > There's plenty of ways to reliably and sanely > avoid typing actual SQL in Python. Well, yes, but they all seem to be a bit hackish in one way or another -- e.g. SQLAlchemy's requirement to use &, |, ~ instead of and, or, not. (That's one of the main motivations behind my Overloadable Boolean Operators PEP, by the way.) I'd like to see some way of attacking this problem head-on, rather than endlessly looking for convoluted ways around it. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4