RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 29 17:24:32 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063111.html

Hello,

> I think short names are more more consistent with the existing naming in
> the standard library.
>
> +1 on db.sqlite from me.

same for me +1 on db.sqlite

> db.sql.sqlite is another possibility, if adding something like Durus or
> ZODB in the same top-level namespace could be considered for 2.6.

-1 on db.sql.sqlite.
Keep structure flat. Or we are eventually in a Java world with
org.something.this.andthat ....

--
bye by Wolfgang

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063111.html below:

[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?