RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 30 02:45:06 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063089.html

On 3/29/06, Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/29/06, Fredrik Lundh <fredrik at pythonware.com> wrote:
>
> > from a user perspective, adding this to the standard library is a no-brainer.
> > the only reason not to add it would be if the release managers don't have
> > time to sort out the build issues.
>
> Agreed. As a SQL user, it feels like a no-brainer to me, as well. I'd
> love to see a DB-API compliant module, and an embedded SQL database,
> in the core. I don't believe that there's anything comparable to
> (py)sqlite on that score.
>
> And as Anthony pointed out, it provides a nice upgrade path to
> "bigger" SQL/DB-API solutions.
>
> +1 from me.

+1 here, too; just as /f said, the only real issue is time (as in, is
it too late to get such a package into 2.5), but with the volunteering
I've seen that should be feasible.

I just hope we get a BDFL +1 soon so I can add the good news to the
2nd ed of "Python in a Nutshell", which is due to go "printers-wards"
about 8-9 days from now (in order to be ready for OSCON -- the times
from final text version to paper are NOT brief:-).

Alex

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063089.html below:

[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?