On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 16:29 -0500, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > The story is different for PySet_Update(). Defining it now could get in the way > of possible future development for the module (the function may end-up taking a > variable length argument list instead of a single argument). So why not just go ahead and do that now? If you know that's what you want eventually, why wait? From my perspective, adding a NULL at the end of the argument list wouldn't be that big of a deal. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 309 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060329/a60a0799/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4