RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 30 00:41:35 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063064.html

On 3/29/06, Fredrik Lundh <fredrik at pythonware.com> wrote:

> from a user perspective, adding this to the standard library is a no-brainer.
> the only reason not to add it would be if the release managers don't have
> time to sort out the build issues.

Agreed. As a SQL user, it feels like a no-brainer to me, as well. I'd
love to see a DB-API compliant module, and an embedded SQL database,
in the core. I don't believe that there's anything comparable to
(py)sqlite on that score.

And as Anthony pointed out, it provides a nice upgrade path to
"bigger" SQL/DB-API solutions.

+1 from me.

Paul.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063064.html below:

[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?