A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063062.html below:

[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?

[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5? [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?Anthony Baxter anthony at interlink.com.au
Thu Mar 30 00:15:46 CEST 2006
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 08:22, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:
> >Agreed.  pysqlite is solid and widely accepted, and AFAIK has no
> >competition.
>
> FWIW: http://www.rogerbinns.com/apsw.html

Looks interesting, but not being DB-API compliant is a huge issue for 
the stdlib. Part of the reason I want to see pysqlite in 2.5 is that 
it follows the standard DB-API. People can start off using it, then 
look at switching to a larger database if their application needs 
grow. 

-- 
Anthony Baxter     <anthony at interlink.com.au>
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4