RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 29 23:15:14 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063048.html

Guido van Rossum wrote:

> Unless you've recanted on that already, let me point out that I've
> never seen sqlite, and I've ignored this thread, so I don't know what
> the disagreement is all about.

what disagreement ?

sqlite is a widely used light-weight SQL library (http://www.sqlite.org)
that's an excellent choice for many kind of applications.  it has no com-
petition in this space.

gerald's pysqlite binding is a second-generation implementation of the
full DB-API (http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0249/) for sqlite.

from a user perspective, adding this to the standard library is a no-brainer.
the only reason not to add it would be if the release managers don't have
time to sort out the build issues.

</F>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063048.html below:

[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?