Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063025.html below:

[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Bill Janssen wrote:
>> I think short names are more more consistent with the existing naming in 
>> the standard library.
> 
> Which doesn't make it a good idea.  +1 on adding longer top-level
> package names as aliases for existing shorter top-level package names.

Which existing short names do you have in mind? os? xml? email?
Let's not get excited over names here.

I say: let the RM or the BDFL, whoever feels responsible to pronounce whether
PySQLite actually gets in, decide which name it will have.

Georg

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Next message: [Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4