RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 29 15:35:48 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063009.html

Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 19:47 +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote:
> 
>>My only concern about this is that it wouldn't be possible for other 
>>authors to provide 3rd party packages as (for instance) db.mysqldb
>>because of the way package importing works. And I'd prefer 
>>'database.sqlite' rather than 'db.sqlite'.
> 
> +1 on 'database' as the top-level package name.

I think short names are more more consistent with the existing naming in 
the standard library.

+1 on db.sqlite from me.

db.sql.sqlite is another possibility, if adding something like Durus or 
ZODB in the same top-level namespace could be considered for 2.6.

-- Gerhard

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/063009.html below:

[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?