Terry Reedy wrote: [me:] > >> For what it's worth[1], I think Raymond is absolutely on crack here. [Greg Ewing:] > > +1 on a good concrete set API from me, too. [Terry:] > For what it's worth, I think Gareth's crack at Raymond is childish and out > of place here. Er, it wasn't a crack at Raymond, it was a crack at a particular position he's taking on a particular issue. What I intended (but may have failed) to convey was: "Raymond's a clever and sensible chap, and this is a very weird position for a clever and sensible person to be taking: must be the drugs." And, just in case it's still not clear, I wasn't in fact suggesting that Raymond *is* on drugs either. However: if Raymond, or anyone else, is offended, then I'm sorry. Now, what about the technical issues, as opposed to the way I happened to introduce my comments? -- g
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4