[Thomas Wouters] >> So does that make all cycles involving only objects with finalizers >> impervious to cycle-gc? I guess it'd have to be that way. [again] > Er, I meant to say 'does that make all cycles involving just one object with > a finalizer impervious to cycle-gc'. Both are true, and both are implied by this sharper variant: all cycles containing at least one object with a finalizer [etc]
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4