Gerhard Häring wrote: > I know that pushing new things into Python 2.5 should happen soon, if at > all. So *if* pysqlite should go into Python, I propose that I release > pysqlite 2.2.0 and we integrate that into the Python alpha release. +1 ! > If this is going to happen, I want it to happen under a different > package name than "pysqlite2" and it's probably a good idea to skip > "sqlite" too, because there are still users of the SQLite 1.x API (*) > and this is the package name of that API. OTOH, "sqlite" would be the > natural name if it ends up in Python. Perhaps "sqlitedb" ... db.sqlite3 ? (it wraps version 3 of the sqlite engine, after all...) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4