On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 18:00 +1100, Anthony Baxter wrote: > On Tuesday 28 March 2006 17:53, Neal Norwitz wrote: > > In order to do the best possible job and avoid silly errors, there > > shouldn't be any checkins which could change behaviour that do not > > include a test. I'm not talking about updating comments or string > > constants. But even trivial changes can cause regressions or > > incompatible changes. Just like failing tests, code checked in > > without tests is fair game for being reverted if there is anything > > questionable. > > +1 from me. > > Anyone disagree? Not me! -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 309 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060328/2c9ee991/attachment-0001.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4