RetroSearch Browse

Tue Mar 28 09:00:32 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062906.html

On Tuesday 28 March 2006 17:53, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> In order to do the best possible job and avoid silly errors, there
> shouldn't be any checkins which could change behaviour that do not
> include a test.  I'm not talking about updating comments or string
> constants.  But even trivial changes can cause regressions or
> incompatible changes.  Just like failing tests, code checked in
> without tests is fair game for being reverted if there is anything
> questionable.

+1 from me. 

Anyone disagree?

Anthony
-- 
Anthony Baxter     <anthony at interlink.com.au>
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062906.html below:

[Python-Dev] improving quality