RetroSearch Browse

Tue Mar 28 05:29:18 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062892.html

On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 10:20 -0500, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> Why don't we expose _PySet_Next() for Barry and leave it out of the public API 
> for everyone else.

Just so I understand exactly what you mean by "leave it out of the
public API", let me ask: are you saying you don't want to document the
function?  Do you not want to include it in setobject.h?  No tests for
it?

If all you're suggesting is to stick an underscore in front of the name
to indicate "it's something special", I could live with that, although I
don't see much benefit.

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 309 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060327/f810a59c/attachment.pgp 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062892.html below:

[Python-Dev] PySet API