RetroSearch Browse

Mon Mar 27 16:24:03 CEST 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062862.html

On Sun, 2006-03-26 at 13:24 -0500, Raymond Hettinger wrote:

> We have a perfectly good way to iterate with PyIter_Next().  It may take a 
> couple of extra lines, but it is easy to get correct and has no surprises.  It 
> seems that the only issue is that Barry says that he refuses to use the iterator 
> protocol.  Heck, just turn it into a list and index directly.  There is no need 
> to muck-up the set api for this.

I just think you have a narrow vision of how Python sets can be used in
a C application.

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 309 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060327/7de55752/attachment.pgp 

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062862.html below:

[Python-Dev] PySet_Next (Was: PySet API)