On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 22:01 -0500, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > [Me] > > There is a semantic difference between > > code like s+=t and s.update(t). The former only works when t is a set > > and the latter works for any iterable. When the C code corresponds to > > the Python code, that knowledge is kept intact and there is no confusion > > between > > PyNumber_InPlaceAdd(s,t) vs PyObject_CallMethod(s, "update", "(O)", t). > > Of course, that should have been s|=t and PyNumber_InPlaceOr(). Heh, my point exactly. You wouldn't have gotten confused about PySet_Update(). :) -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 309 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20060325/06c891a6/attachment-0001.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4