Neal Norwitz wrote: > On 3/22/06, "Martin v. Löwis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: >> M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >>> For the Snake-Farm we had a separate mailing list, so I'd prefer >>> that if possible. This lets you opt-in to the messages and also >>> makes it easier to search via the python.org search facility. >> I'll wait for other people to voice an opinion. Creating a new >> mailing list is an effort I'd like to avoid. > > Hopefully we will get it tuned better soon so there aren't so many > mails. Unfortunately, it may take a while due to the ssize_t issues > getting fixed as we find them. > > I'd be happy if the messages were on python-checkins. +1 on simply changing the messages to python-checkins instead of here - it gives the build failure better context than it gets on python-dev, and subscribing to python-checkins is a fair indication of willingness to receive frequent automated mail ;) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4