RetroSearch Browse

Thu Mar 23 03:21:59 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062764.html

Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> [2006-03-21 13:20:53 +1200]:
> > Gareth McCaughan wrote:
> > >
> > >    def f((x0,y0) as p0, (x1,y1) as p1):

> For maximal utility, this would affect the calling signature of the
> function, too: it would now have keyword arguments named p0 and p1.

I still think it hurts readability of the header
too much to be worth the benefit. To me it would
seem much clearer all round to write

   def f(p0, p1):
     x0, y0 = p0
     x1, y1 = p1

-- 
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | Carpe post meridiam!          	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | (I'm not a morning person.)          |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062764.html below:

[Python-Dev] Py3k: Except clause syntax