RetroSearch Browse

Sat Mar 18 21:21:51 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062589.html

On Fri, Mar 17, 2006, Georg Brandl wrote:
> Greg Ewing wrote:
>> Russell E. Owen wrote:
>>> 
>>> Another thing that would be *really* useful is to list the actual 
>>> built-in types with the category. For example:
>>> Sequence Types (str, unicode, list, tuple, buffer, xrange)
>>> Mapping Types (dict)
>> 
>> +1
> 
> If I understand correctly what you mean, that's already done.

Partially, by my standard.  That is, the names of the types are now
listed, but you still have to drill down two layers to get to the string
methods.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming,
is not worth knowing."  --Alan Perlis

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062589.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python Library Reference top page too long