Greg Ewing wrote: > Russell E. Owen wrote: > >> Fundamentally I think what's wanted is: >> - Another level of sub-TOCs, e.g. one for "Sequence Types", "Mapping >> Types", etc. Every page that has sub-topics or intimately related should >> have a list of them at the beginning. >> - The special methods for a given type of class would make a really good >> "intimately related" topic for "Sequence Types" and "Mapping Types". > > +1 to all that. I agree that the docs on __special__ methods really are hard to find if you don't know where to look. >> Another thing that would be *really* useful is to list the actual >> built-in types with the category. For example: >> Sequence Types (str, unicode, list, tuple, buffer, xrange) >> Mapping Types (dict) > > +1 If I understand correctly what you mean, that's already done. Georg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4