Russell E. Owen wrote: > Fundamentally I think what's wanted is: > - Another level of sub-TOCs, e.g. one for "Sequence Types", "Mapping > Types", etc. Every page that has sub-topics or intimately related should > have a list of them at the beginning. > - The special methods for a given type of class would make a really good > "intimately related" topic for "Sequence Types" and "Mapping Types". +1 to all that. > Another thing that would be *really* useful is to list the actual > built-in types with the category. For example: > Sequence Types (str, unicode, list, tuple, buffer, xrange) > Mapping Types (dict) +1 Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4