Josiah Carlson a écrit : > They aren't considered because they are *obvious* to most (if not all) > sane people who use Python. They are not *that* obvious. Logical operations on ints have allowed users to forget about size (and shoot themselves in the foot from time to time). Or is 1^(~1) == -1 obvious ? Well, maybe that's not sane either :-) > Think of future bytes behavior to be > similar to current array behavior, with a few bits and pieces added to > make life easier (like all of the current string methods, etc.) > I didn't get before that the array behavior really *defined* the bytes behavior. OK, I'll keep that in mind. Cheers, BC
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4