A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062406.html below:

[Python-Dev] About "Coverity Study Ranks LAMP Code Quality"

[Python-Dev] About "Coverity Study Ranks LAMP Code Quality" [Python-Dev] About "Coverity Study Ranks LAMP Code Quality"Fredrik Lundh fredrik at pythonware.com
Wed Mar 15 06:56:02 CET 2006
Greg Ewing wrote:

> Fredrik Lundh wrote:
>
> >     return=NULL; output=junk => out of memory
> >     return=junk; output=-1 => cannot do this
> >     return=pointer; output=value => did this, returned value bytes
>
> > I agree that the design is a bit questionable;
>
> It sure is. If you get both NULL and -1 returned, how are
> you supposed to know which one is the junk?

I was about to say "by doing the tests in the prescribed order",
but you're right that it's not obvious that the function check
that it returns the right kind of junk...  (it's possible that the
junk in the second line is actually "pointer to some other ob-
ject").

I'll have a look.

</F>



More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4