A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062332.html below:

[Python-Dev] Making builtins more efficient

[Python-Dev] Making builtins more efficient [Python-Dev] Making builtins more efficientPhillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Mon Mar 13 21:14:09 CET 2006
At 02:47 PM 3/13/2006 -0500, Jim Jewett wrote:
>Paul Moore wrote:
>
> > Is there any practical way of detecting and flagging
> > constructs like the above (remotely shadowing a
> > builtin in another module)?
>
>Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> > the patch ended up being backed out ... too strict
> > of a check to be accepted for Python 2.4.
>
>http://svn.python.org/view/python/trunk/Objects/moduleobject.c
>
>It was revision 33054, backed out in 33084.
>
>The patch warned about any shadowing of builtins, which
>probably is too strict.

I'm curious: what actually happened?  What things were causing warnings?

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4