RetroSearch Browse

Wed Mar 8 20:47:26 CET 2006 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062190.html

Ian Bicking <ianb at colorstudy.com> wrote:
> 
> Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> >>Bad idea, as several pointed out -- quit() should return a 0 exit
> >>to the shell.
> > 
> > 
> > I like the idea of making "quit" callable.  One small concern I have
> > is that people will use it in scripts to exit (rather than one of
> > the other existing ways to exit).  OTOH, maybe that's a feature.
> 
> I actually thought it was only defined for interactive sessions, but a 
> brief test shows I was wrong.  It doesn't bother me, but it does make me 
> think that exit(1) should exit with a code of one.

Sounds like the quit/exit bits are becoming aliases for sys.exit with
special docstrings.  That would be fine with me.

 - Josiah

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-March/062190.html below:

[Python-Dev] quit() on the prompt